前言:网上关于缓冲区溢出的资料也有很多,但我在阅读过程中发现介绍的都不是很明了,而且各网站也只是转贴老外的那篇译文而已,不仅内容有缺损,而且程序也无法调通,因为GCC版本不一样.经过几天的琢磨,终于明白了真正的原理,特地写出来分享.
测试环境:
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-Linux/3.2.3/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --host=i386-redhat-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-24)
$ gdb -v
GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.0post-0.20031117.6rh)
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux-gnu".
$ uname -a
Linux candy 2.4.21-9.EL #1 Thu Jan 8 17:03:13 EST 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
实例:
网上和我的这个实例雷同的也有,但是他们的是无法正确实现的.因为要害的跳转代码没有计算正确.(GCC版本问题,呵呵)
/************
* a.c
************/
void function(void)
{
char buffer[5];
int* ret;
ret=buffer+28;
(*ret)+=10;
}
void main()
{
int x;
x=0;
function();
x=1;
printf("%d\n",x);
return;
}
/*end*/
懂C语言的人都会认为最后的输出结果是1,可惜输出结果为0.为什么呢?请听解释.
实例分析:
相关堆栈的基础知识我就不罗嗦了,网上的介绍很多.
要害问题在于如何确定源代码
ret=buffer+28;
(*ret)+=10;
中的28 和 10
编译(会有warning,不用管他.)
$gcc -g -o a a.c //加上-g 用来在gdb中调试
$gdb a
(gdb)disas main //得到反汇编代码 如下:
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x08048366 : push %ebp
0x08048367 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x08048369 : sub $0x8,%esp
0x0804836c : and $0xfffffff0,%esp
0x0804836f : mov $0x0,%eax
0x08048374 : sub %eax,%esp
0x08048376 : movl $0x0,0xfffffffc(%ebp)
0x0804837d : call 0x8048348
0x08048382 : movl $0x1,0xfffffffc(%ebp)
0x08048389 : sub $0x8,%esp
0x0804838c : pushl 0xfffffffc(%ebp)
0x0804838f : push $0x8048474
0x08048394 : call 0x8048288
0x08048399 : add $0x10,%esp
0x0804839c : leave
0x0804839d : ret
End of assembler dump.
(gdb)disas function
Dump of assembler code for function function:
0x08048348 : push %ebp
0x08048349 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x0804834b : sub $0x28,%esp
0x0804834e : lea 0xffffffe8(%ebp),%eax
0x08048351 : add $0x1c,%eax
0x08048354 : mov %eax,0xffffffe4(%ebp)
0x08048357 : mov 0xffffffe4(%ebp),%edx
0x0804835a : mov 0xffffffe4(%ebp),%eax
0x0804835d : mov (%eax),%eax
0x0804835f : add $0xa,%eax
0x08048362 : mov %eax,(%edx)
0x08048364 : leave
0x08048365 : ret
End of assembler dump.
可以得知当main中执行 0x0804837d : call 0x8048348 <
|
